By D. León Dantes
Author of The Resilient Philosopher: The Prism of Reality
Founder of Vision LEON LLC
Host of The Resilient Philosopher Podcast
“Some people complain to be heard. Others stay silent to understand. Intelligence is not loud. It’s precise.”
— The Resilient Philosopher
In a viral-style article from YourTango titled “11 Things Average People Complain About That Don’t Bother Highly Intelligent Minds At All,” the claim is made that intelligence inoculates one against daily frustrations. While attractive as a narrative, this oversimplification hides a deeper truth—one that the average mind may miss, and that a resilient one must confront.
My philosophy does not seek to glorify intelligence but rather to deconstruct it. Intelligence without reflection is merely memorized arrogance. Therefore, I examined this article through two mirrors: academic research and the prism of resilient thought.
Let’s break down the claims one by one—then weigh what’s real, what’s recycled internet wisdom, and what leadership demands we understand.
1. Rudeness Doesn’t Bother Intelligent People
🧭 Claim: Smart people don’t internalize rude behavior because they know it reflects the other person, not them.
🧠 Reality through Research:
Psychological research does support the idea that emotionally intelligent individuals are better at managing interpersonal conflict. Gross (2002) emphasized that emotion regulation, especially reappraisal (reframing a situation), is a skill correlated with better mental health and social functioning.
But here’s the catch: emotional intelligence (EQ) is distinct from cognitive intelligence (IQ). You can have a genius IQ and still explode at a waiter.
📘 Source:
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291.
💡 Philosophical View:
I don’t measure leadership by who stays calm under pressure, but by who takes accountability after losing control. It’s not that intelligent people aren’t bothered—they just learn how not to betray their purpose in that moment. That’s resilience, not superiority.
2. Complaints About the Weather or Traffic Are Beneath Them
🧭 Claim: Highly intelligent minds don’t waste energy on things they can’t control.
🧠 Reality through Research:
Kowalski (1996) noted that complaining has both a social bonding function and a coping function. Chronic complainers, however, may suffer negative cognitive effects, such as memory decline and poor problem-solving.
There’s evidence that rumination and repetitive negative talk weaken neural pathways involved in adaptive behavior. But again, no study equates this directly with IQ.
📘 Source:
Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 179–196.
💡 Philosophical View:
Complaining isn’t always weakness. Sometimes it’s a signal of suppressed injustice. The resilient mind doesn’t shut down complaints—it investigates them. If you never complain, you might be too comfortable or too disconnected. That’s not leadership. That’s apathy dressed in Zen.
3. Disagreements Don’t Upset Them
🧭 Claim: Intelligent people welcome differing opinions and avoid becoming offended.
🧠 Reality through Research:
Studies on intellectual humility suggest that open-mindedness is a strong predictor of better decision-making, creativity, and interpersonal cooperation (Krumrei-Mancuso & Rouse, 2016). Yet this humility is not a guaranteed trait of intelligence—many “smart” people use their intellect to dominate, not to understand.
📘 Source:
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221.
💡 Philosophical View:
Disagreement only teaches when the ego doesn’t interrupt. The resilient philosopher doesn’t get offended by disagreement—but does get offended by intellectual laziness disguised as opinion. Not every view deserves validation. Some just need investigation.
4. They Don’t Obsess Over Fairness
🧭 Claim: They know life isn’t fair and don’t waste time lamenting injustice.
🧠 Reality through Research:
Contrary to this article’s insinuation, research shows that fairness concerns are deeply hardwired into human psychology, across all cognitive levels. Even animals, like capuchin monkeys, respond negatively to perceived inequality (Brosnan & de Waal, 2003).
📘 Source:
Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297–299.
💡 Philosophical View:
Only those who benefit from unfairness preach the futility of fairness. True intelligence confronts injustice, not excuses it. Leadership without the pursuit of fairness is tyranny with a vocabulary.
5. They Don’t Worry About What Others Think
🧭 Claim: Intelligent minds don’t care about being liked.
🧠 Reality through Research:
Psychological safety, reputation management, and self-concept all matter in group dynamics, especially in leadership roles. Even the most independent thinkers adjust behavior based on perceived social standing (Poropat, 2009).
📘 Source:
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
💡 Philosophical View:
The resilient mind values what people observe, not what they think. If perception misleads people into misunderstanding your integrity, it’s your job to clarify—unless your ego needs them confused.
The Fallacy of the Superior Mind
Articles like this often serve as ego candy for readers who already believe they’re smarter than most. But here’s the truth:
Intelligence without humility is manipulation. Intelligence without empathy is machinery. Intelligence without accountability is the beginning of tyranny.
Being unbothered isn’t always wisdom—it can be privilege, detachment, or trauma response. In The Resilient Philosopher, I argue that wisdom is not what avoids struggle, but what interrogates it.
Final Reflection
Highly intelligent people aren’t immune to frustration—they’re often drowning in it. What separates them is not indifference, but the choice to seek meaning instead of validation.
So when I see articles romanticizing the “unbothered genius,” I offer an alternative:
Be bothered. Just don’t be broken. Be intelligent. Just don’t be arrogant. Be reflective. And never stop questioning the noise that calls itself truth.
🔖 References
- Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291.
- Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 179–196.
- Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221.
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). Five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
- Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297–299.
Discover more from The Resilient Philosopher
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.